Planets are not spinning rock balls [Luminary Entities]

Planets
[When reality defies the narrative you were led to beLIEve...
It's time to upgrade your factory installed operating system]

The “planets” are not terra firma. You can't land a spaceship on that Buck Rogers...

NASA provides CGI imagery and pseudo science-fiction tales.


Planets are like cymatic frequencies. They would be best described as "Luminary Entities".


Watch this. Live examples make it obvious. When you see a still image it is difficult to see.


Tesla hinted “If you want to understand the universe think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration”.
This understanding certainly makes it possible to understand many of these other points.

Each "planet" emits sonoluminescent energy at different frequencies. When these sources come closer to us and move further away, that energy affects us. It causes us to think/feel/act differently. This lends some credence to astrology. It's more simple to realize this effect with the sun as it moves across the sky, the changes that take place based on the strength of this energy.

 

 

Here's a fun clip on Cymatics.

https://youtu.be/Q3oItpVa9fs

When you understand the true nature of the planets, you will comprehend astrology on a deeper level.
Each frequency has a different effect on us. We are energetic beings. If Quantum Physics is correct... We are composed of pure light [condensed] at the core level. It's all about "energy, frequency and vibration".

Dr Rife understood frequency. By determining the M.O.R. (Mortal Oscillatory Rate) of a pathogen he could target that specific frequency with a device he created, using electro magnetic energy he could kill that specific entity while the remains cells and organism were unharmed. He cured many people from cancer before he was basically destroyed and discredited by the Rockefeller controlled medical establishment...

The point is "energy, frequency and vibration" ARE key to comprehending the universe. That hint is priceless. Tesla was the genius.

 

 

 

 

The best clip I can recommend on the subject of real reality is this presentation by Michael Tellinger. It covers a wide range of amazing information that has been hidden from the masses. You really need this to understand what is being presented here. It's a pile of important stuff they didn't tell us about as part of the mass indoctrination.  

 

Michael Tellinger - 2017 Sound Resonance Magnetics and Reality
A nice theory about our holographic universe with a little evidence  

 Moon: Self-luminous?

If the moon was reflecting sunlight, that light would share the same color temperature, quality and other characteristics of sunlight.
Moonlight is not at all like sunlight. Different color temp and characteristics. Moonlight is directly cool, and warmer in the shade. He shows an example of this with thermometer. Sunlight is the opposite, directly hot, cooler in the shade.
Moonlight is 4100-4150 Kelvin
Sunlight is 5000k horizon and 5700k vertical. 6500k overcast.
If it was reflected, it would share these traits.

"In direct sunlight a thermometer will read higher than another thermometer placed in the shade, but in full, direct moonlight a thermometer will read lower than another placed in the shade. If the Sun’s light is collected in a large lens and thrown to a focus point it can create significant heat, while the Moon’s light collected similarly creates no heat. In the “Lancet Medical Journal,” from March 14th, 1856, particulars are given of several experiments which proved the Moon’s rays when concentrated can actually reduce the temperature upon a thermometer more than eight degrees.

So sunlight and moonlight clearly have altogether different properties, and furthermore the Moon itself cannot physically be both a spherical body and a reflector of the Sun’s light! Reflectors must be flat or concave for light rays to have any angle of incidence; If a reflector’s surface is convex then every ray of light points in a direct line with the radius perpendicular to the surface resulting in no reflection."

So through a litany of simple tests it has become a proven fact the the moon omits its own light.

The Bible makes this distinction. “And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.” Genesis 1:16 KJV

Not that we can trust the KJV... I have uncovered some very strong info to indicate it was corrupted and compromised., but that's another topic... Interesting nonetheless.

Crrow has done some enlightening independent research on the moon.

Did you ever suspect you may not be an accidental apeman riding a spinning water ball at Mach 88 through Spaceland after all? What if everything we were led to believe, was "inverted"?

Earth is motionless

Earth has been scientifically proven to be motionless, on several occasions using various different means.

Michelson Morley, set out to determine the earth's rotation speed. They failed to measure ANY movement. They concluded it could be two possibilities, either Aether was not present, or earth was motionless. Einstein chose the latter and changed his theory of relativity as a result. Sadly he was exposed as a shill when the Sangac experiment proved the existence of aether and again that earth was motionless.

USAF sponsored Silvertooth experiment proved earth is motionless and aether exists, using better equipment in 1986. Published E.W Silvertooth , " Special Relativity ," Nature Magazine Vol 322 (Augest 1986): p.590 .

Carefully worded to avoid the sensitive subject of motionless earth, it focuses on the confirmation that the aether exists, and delicately alludes to this changing the theory of relativity. Knowing the full historical significance of this confirmation regarding the Michelson Morley experiment and in relation to Einstein's theory of relativity; motionless earth and the aether, it has profound implications. But you need to read between the lines to get it. And it was very quietly published with no media attention to avoid an avalanche of reality from enveloping the masses.

I know from my own experience as a photographer that if earth were moving, long exposure imagery from earth would be impossible. Any movement/vibration, however slight would blur the image. I can leave the shutter open for minutes and have perfectly sharp images of earth, with stars blurring on anything past 25 seconds.

The sun, moon and stars are moving, not earth.

There has never been any scientific, consistent, repeatable proof that earth is spinning.

Focault's Pendulum is so inconsistent most in operation today are admittedly mechanized.
The Coriolis effect is inconsistent as well and can be manipulated to achieve different results.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



I have come to believe that the motion of the Earth cannot be detected by any optical experiment."- Physicist, Albert Einstein

"...to the question whether or not the motion of the Earth in space can be made perceptible in terrestrial experiments. We have already remarked...that all attempts of this nature led to a negative result. Before the theory of relativity was put forward, it was difficult to become reconciled to this negative result."- Physicist, Albert Einstein

"Briefly, everything occurs as if the Earth were at rest..."- Physicist, Henrick Lorentz

"There was just one alternative; the earth's true velocity through space might happen to have been nil."- Physicist, Arthur Eddington

"The failure of the many attempts to measure terrestrially any effects of the earth's motion..."- Physicist, Wolfgang Pauli

"We do not have and cannot have any means of discovering whether or not we are carried along in a uniform motion of translation."- Physicist, Henri Poincaré

"A great deal of research has been carried out concerning the influence of the Earth's movement. The results were always negative."- Physicist, Henri Poincaré

"This conclusion directly contradicts the explanation...which presupposes that the Earth moves."- Physicist, Albert Michelson

"The data [of Michelson-Morley] were almost unbelievable...There was only one other possible conclusion to draw — that the Earth was at rest."- Physicist, Bernard Jaffe

"We can't feel our motion through space, nor has any physical experiment ever proved that the Earth actually is in motion."- Historian, Lincoln Barnett

"Thus, even now, three and a half centuries after Galileo...it is still remarkably difficult to say categorically whether the earth moves..."- Physicist, Julian B. Barbour

"There is no planetary observation by which we on Earth can prove that the Earth is moving in an orbit around the sun."- Physicist, I. Bernard Cohen

"Thus, failure [of Michelson-Morley] to observe different speeds of light at different times of the year suggested that the Earth must be 'at rest'...It was therefore the 'preferred' frame for measuring absolute motion in space. Yet we have known since Galileo that the Earth is not the center of the universe. Why should it be at rest in space?"- Physicist, Adolph Baker

"...The easiest explanation was that the earth was fixed in the ether and that everything else in the universe moved with respect to the earth and the ether...Such an idea was not considered seriously, since it would mean in effect that our earth occupied the omnipotent position in the universe, with all the other heavenly bodies paying homage by moving around it."- Physicist, James Coleman

"In the effort to explain the Michelson-Morley experiment...the thought was advanced that the Earth might be stationary...Such an idea was not considered seriously, since it would mean in effect that our Earth occupied the omnipotent position in the universe, with all the other heavenly bodies paying homage by revolving around it."- Physicist, Arthur S. Otis
 

 

 

NASA images of planets are CGI creations... The Mars rover is actually in Greenland/Devon Island. That was exposed awhile back and they use the standard excuse, "we were testing"... Although when squirrels, birds and clouds get caught in the pictures from "Mars" things get "interesting"...


Vincent Brady created the most amazing timelapse images of the stars movement that really puts the universe in perspective. One look at the motion of the stars and you clearly do not see the movements one would if that theory were anywhere near correct.
Watch this Specifically the section at 2:00

https://youtu.be/ZpVEFI5KHbg

© Vincent Brady

I initially considered that Earth was within the celestial sphere, as it spun around us, that's what observation would lead us to believe. But... When you watch the movement of the stars in timelapse, wide angle, you'll see the big ball spinning above you. The wheel in the sky, keeps turning.

It's an optical illusion using refraction to make it look like it envelopes and goes around you on the edges.

This clip about the illusion of refraction were important for me to finally see the possibility.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0wizl1p6qE&t=14s
 
This clip about light is a key. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpeXEgxNgEE


Meanwhile the celestial sphere spins inside, and above us.
This exceptional imagery captured by Vincent Brady illustrates this movement perfectly.

©Vincent Brady

This symbol may help, many consider this to represent the "Flat Earth" model, but it really represents a dielectric torroid field, that demonstrates the stars movements.

 Eclipse, compared to torroid field.

 Ken Wheeler is the man to listen to concerning the realities of magnetism .

Eclipses

Most Americans are unaware that both solar/lunar eclipses are covered by the Black Sun, not the earth.
Indians/Hindus, Egyptians and many others know.
The secret societies are well aware.

Very deep significance in ancient Egyptian and occult practices, this is hidden from the masses, albeit in plain sight. Far more important than a simple celestial body.

To learn some truth about eclipses, you can start in Vedic cosmology it is called Rahu. "Rahu ate the sun". Follow that rabbit down the hole.

NASA will tell you it doesn't exist...
Ask why there are over 50 documented eclipses with both the sun and moon on Earth's horizon...??? I personally witnessed one myself. Proving the earth’s shadow is not affecting phases or eclipses.
Whoops. Earth is innocent... AMEN. :)

Most of us saw this in one way or another. Nobody saw or photographed the moon that day. And the "object" that caused this eclipse was moving the opposite direction of the moon...

"Rahu ate the sun". The moon is innocent...

Video playlist with scores of clips on various Black Sun related topics that support this research.

The cosmos is not at all what most beLIEve. It’s the inverse. And it’s protected by an optical illusion type effect due to light refraction and other effects. 
If you don’t want to warp your brain, just consider everything, beLIEve nothing. It’ll come to you when you have enough of the pieces. It could take years, even when you have been presented with the information.  It may first seem insane…

The Black Sun, is by far the most challenging to research. It is not something you can just “Google”… There are endless theories and explanations to overwhelm, by design. Hidden behind layers upon layers like an onion. But it is part of our “challenge” to discover and discern. After years of researching this, as of today, after peeling back the layers, this is what I consider “true”, but new information can change always that. On that note, if you “know”, and can add to, or correct any errors in this thesis, please do.



This clip from Steven Christopher explains the octahedron. https://youtu.be/6R27VbVhm6Q

 

https://youtu.be/6R27VbVhm6Q

This animation by Steven Christopher is crucial.
Click the play button.
Watch the octahedron as it spins.
"The wheel in the sky keeps turning"...

If it doesn't play here use this link
https://youtu.be/fTARhNVBTS4 

Once you see that big ball of stars spinning above you, you can’t unsee it. 

4k Trona Pinnacles timelapse big night

 

 

 

https://youtu.be/kGtdQybQo9M

Kopper King Mine bunkhouse Milky Way Timelapse

https://youtu.be/zw15RXseDJU 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more on the Black/Invisible Sun {The Hidden One}
https://exhibitxxxxx.blogspot.com/2019/04/amen-black-sun.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now set all this aside, at this point I strongly consider that our reality is an elaborate frequency propagated simulation. (That's another topic to be explored in depth) In that case the background of our "existence" is less important. The fact that we have no tangible proof of what our background truly is, it lends some credence to this crazy simulation theory, and the challenge we face.


If you are not aware you should seriously dive in. It will change your entire perspective about life as you know it and expose a pile of lies they are deceiving us with.
When you better understand the plane of our existence, your quest for life purpose and meaning will be SO much clearer...